Menu

Notes On Early Thai Religion

 

 

Home

A

s I have related elsewhere, the sasana or "religion" of the Thai population is by and large Buddhist, and decidedly of the Southern Hīnayānic School of the so-called Theravāda, or Doctrine of the Elders. But I suggest that it may more properly be considered as Sri Lankan Buddhism, as it donned its early form there in very ancient times among an elite of the island's Sinhalese speakers. It may also be described as Pāli Buddhism for its strict adherence to the Pāli Language literature, however compiled by the ancient Sinhalese from Sinhala translations of earlier Pāli texts. What is more, the Theravāda regards this extensive body of scripture as its paramount ecclesiastical authority. Again, all the same, it needs to be suggested that the Theravāda sect is a historical construction. It is a highly differentiating class of Buddhist faith with the strong propensity for conceiving itself in contradistinction to 1) all things "Hindu," and 2) the perceived state of disciplinary and doctrinal corruption into which all other Buddhist sects have descended.

But for a period extending about nine hundred years before the thirteenth-century arrival of Sinhalese Buddhism, a multitude of religious approaches coexisted in Thailand. These ranged from the Brahmanistic styles of ascetic endeavours to the sundry systems of Śiva-Śakti worship, from the Vaishnava and Krsna bhakti schools to the Pure Land cults of the Mahāyāna. Yet in contrast to the conformity-imposing system of today, the people of Thailand would be well flabbergasted to learn of the great multiplicity of religious forms that flourished in the region before the 14th century. They could hardly accept that there also once existed an awe-inspiring variety of independent religious figures such as shamans, sādhus, yogins and the rishis, that dwelt beyond the pale of any specific community or social convention. These indigenous wisdom-knowers roamed about as free as the breeze and practiced now-vanished forms of asceticism. Such holy men were often skilled healers, as well, and commanded high respect from prominent sectarian leaders.

But today most Thais could hardly begin to fathom the opulent fabric of religious diversity that had formerly been woven between the ancient ruling houses of Tun-sun, Pan-P'an, Lopburi, Nakhon Ratchasima, Jaiya (ancient name Grahi),[1] Si Chon, Tambralinga, Sathing Phra, Langakuka, Phatthalung, Pattani, Nakhon Sri Dhammaraj and others. Stretching across a near one thousand-year period beginning as early as the 5th century CE, a broad range of Brāhmanical and Buddhist schools flourished in the independent kingdoms and principalities that once comprised the Central Plains of Thailand and the southerly Isthmus of Kra. Numerous forms of Indian religion had thrived there. Brāhmanic, Mahāyānic, Tantrayānic, Vajrayanic and the Pure Land Amitabha and Avalokitesvara sects flourished side by side throughout the overlapping states. They dwelt in a spirit of mutual appreciation with no one heritage having authority over another. The fifth-century Hindu kingdom of Sathing Phra (present day Songkhla province) is an interesting little-known case in point. This extremely ancient city is one of the earliest and most fascinating kingdoms on record. It was a purely Hindu society and important port and from the 5th to the 8th century. A Hīnayāna Buddhist school prospered there in the 7th and 8th centuries. During the late 9th to the early 11th centuries, Mahāyāna Buddhism from Nalanda and Java took root and flowered.[2]

Indeed, a cursory survey of the Buddhist schools alone is enough to show that, by comparison, the Buddhism practiced in early Thailand was far more diverse than that of Tibet.[3] The existence of multiple Hīnayānic sects is adequately documented. Archaeological data indicate that the Mūlasarvastivāda was the dominant Hīnayānic school. It prospered in Sathing Phra and in Phatthalung in the 7th and 8th centuries right alongside varied Brāhmanic-Hindu cults. Mahāyāna Buddhism had already been introduced into the region at this time. By the 9th century, Vajarayāna Buddhism reached the Śrivijaya kingdom, possibly through Java. Its particular sentiment was brilliantly expressed through highly evolved modes of religious statuary. Chinese records, local inscriptions and archaeological remains show that from the end of the 7th through the 11th century the Mahāyānic Madhyāmika and Caityaka (or Mahāsanghika) schools were especially active along the east and west coasts of the southerly Isthmus. So were the Pure Land cults of Avalokiteśvara and Amitabha, which spread from China southward. The Pure Land cult was dominant there from the 8th to 11th century. Khmer-influenced sculptures of Avalokiteśvara and Maitreya dating from the 7th to 9th century were found further north in Lopburi (an old Mon capital) and in villages around Nakhon Ratchasima and Buriram in the region known today as northeast Thailand.[4]

But alas, the intricate tapestry bequeathed by these states has indeed been rendered tenuous with time. One fact, however, is known for sure. Around the second half of the 13th century, Sinhalese Buddhism entered the Central Plains and the Southern Peninsula region of early Thailand and steadily displaced all other religious traditions.  

*  *  *

To return once again to our major leitmotif, we reiterate the fact that all of the traditions schools and theories alluded to throughout the course this broader study are, culturally speaking, fundamentally Hindu. They are, in other words, a product of the Greater Indian cultural milieu. Naturally those elements that arrived to Thailand, did so only by the process of filtration, through the various regional cultural screens, and by the gradual processes of accretion, adaptation and evolution. Thus, certain features of Vajrayāna Buddhism came to Thailand directly from Nalanda in Northeast India while other slightly altered forms came from Java. Khmer Vajrayāna was introduced in the 12th century and established itself in two different regions. One infusion came overland through the Central Plains and Northeast regions while another arrived by sea to the southeast coastal kingdom of Nakhon Śri Thammarat.

*  *  *

At the end of the day, one can only concur with the youthful sentiment of French archaeologist George Cœdès that, indeed, it is the tremendous variety of civilizations that existed simultaneously or successively in "Siam" that makes it such an absorbing field of study.[5]

T. D. Harris, last revised 16 Nov 2008.

_______________

Notes

[1] Michael Vickerey, "Cambodia and Its Neighbors in the 15th Century," ARI Working Paper, #27, June 2004, www.ari.nus.edu.sg/pub/wps.htm: 14.

[2] My understanding owes much to resources offered by Thai historian Kamala Tiyavanich, private correspondence, fall, 1998.

[3] Kamala Tiyavanich, Forest Recollections: Wandering Ascetics in 20th Century Thailand, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1997: 303-4, n. 22.

[4] Pattaratorn Chirapravati, Votive Tablets in Thailand (Origins, Styles & Uses), Oxford University Press, 1998. Chirapravati is an art historian who studied the iconography and stylistic development of votive tablets and stupas discovered in Thailand by archaeologists. In her academic work, she excerpts a broad range of religious traditions that flourished between the 6th and 13th centuries around the Isthmus of Kra and the northern portion of the (Malayan) Peninsula, i.e., the region that makes up present day southern Thailand. The votive tablets are small icons, usually made of baked or unbaked clay using a press-mold technique. They apparently originated from an Indian custom (term unknown) and were called "tsa-tsa" in Tibet, but in Thailand they were known as phra phi tham or "tablets made by spirits/angels." According to her thesis, every tablet contains an idea of the particular sect it represents.

[5] George Cœdès, "Recent Archaeological Progress in Siam," in Indian Arts and Letters, New Series, I, 1, 1927: 57-58.

Menu         Home