|
s I have
related elsewhere, the sasana or "religion" of the Thai
population is by and large Buddhist, and decidedly of the Southern Hīnayānic
School of the so-called Theravāda, or Doctrine of the Elders. But I suggest
that it may more properly be considered as Sri Lankan Buddhism, as it donned
its early form there in very ancient times among an elite of the island's
Sinhalese speakers. It may also be described as Pāli Buddhism for its strict
adherence to the Pāli Language literature, however compiled by the ancient
Sinhalese from Sinhala translations of earlier Pāli texts. What is more, the
Theravāda regards this extensive body of scripture as its paramount
ecclesiastical authority. Again, all the same, it needs to be suggested that
the Theravāda sect is a historical construction. It is a highly
differentiating class of Buddhist faith with the strong propensity for
conceiving itself in contradistinction to 1) all things "Hindu," and 2) the
perceived state of disciplinary and doctrinal corruption into which all
other Buddhist sects have descended.
But for a period
extending about nine hundred years before the thirteenth-century arrival of
Sinhalese Buddhism, a multitude of religious approaches coexisted in
Thailand. These ranged from the Brahmanistic styles of ascetic endeavours to
the sundry systems of Śiva-Śakti
worship, from the Vaishnava and Krsna bhakti schools to the Pure Land
cults of the Mahāyāna. Yet in contrast to the conformity-imposing system of
today, the people of Thailand would be well flabbergasted to learn of the
great multiplicity of religious forms that flourished in the region before
the 14th century. They could hardly accept that there also once existed an
awe-inspiring variety of independent religious figures such as shamans,
sādhus, yogins and the rishis, that dwelt beyond the pale
of any specific community or social convention. These indigenous wisdom-knowers
roamed about as free as the breeze and practiced now-vanished forms of
asceticism. Such holy men were often skilled healers, as well, and commanded
high respect from prominent sectarian leaders.
But today most
Thais could hardly begin to fathom the opulent fabric of religious diversity
that had formerly been woven between the ancient ruling houses of Tun-sun,
Pan-P'an, Lopburi, Nakhon Ratchasima, Jaiya (ancient name Grahi),[1]
Si Chon, Tambralinga,
Sathing Phra, Langakuka, Phatthalung, Pattani, Nakhon Sri Dhammaraj and others.
Stretching across a near one thousand-year period beginning as early as the
5th century CE, a broad range of Brāhmanical and Buddhist schools flourished
in the independent kingdoms and principalities that once comprised the
Central Plains of Thailand and the southerly Isthmus of Kra. Numerous forms
of Indian religion had thrived there. Brāhmanic, Mahāyānic, Tantrayānic,
Vajrayanic and the Pure Land Amitabha and Avalokitesvara sects flourished
side by side throughout the overlapping states. They dwelt in a spirit of
mutual appreciation with no one heritage having authority over another. The
fifth-century Hindu kingdom of Sathing Phra (present day Songkhla province)
is an interesting little-known case in point. This extremely ancient city is
one of the earliest and most fascinating kingdoms on record. It was a purely
Hindu society and important port and from the 5th to the 8th century. A
Hīnayāna Buddhist school prospered there in the 7th and 8th centuries.
During the late 9th to the early 11th centuries, Mahāyāna Buddhism from
Nalanda and Java took root and flowered.[2]
Indeed, a
cursory survey of the Buddhist schools alone is enough to show that, by
comparison, the Buddhism practiced in early Thailand was far more diverse
than that of Tibet.[3]
The existence of multiple Hīnayānic sects is adequately documented.
Archaeological data indicate that the Mūlasarvastivāda was the dominant
Hīnayānic school. It prospered in Sathing Phra and in Phatthalung in the 7th
and 8th centuries right alongside varied Brāhmanic-Hindu cults. Mahāyāna
Buddhism had already been introduced into the region at this time. By the
9th century, Vajarayāna Buddhism reached the Śrivijaya kingdom, possibly
through Java. Its particular sentiment was brilliantly expressed through
highly evolved modes of religious statuary. Chinese records, local
inscriptions and archaeological remains show that from the end of the 7th
through the 11th century the Mahāyānic Madhyāmika and Caityaka (or
Mahāsanghika) schools were especially active along the east and west coasts
of the southerly Isthmus. So were the Pure Land cults of Avalokiteśvara and
Amitabha, which spread from China southward. The Pure Land cult was dominant
there from the 8th to 11th century. Khmer-influenced sculptures of
Avalokiteśvara
and Maitreya dating from the 7th to 9th century were found further north in
Lopburi (an old Mon capital) and in villages around Nakhon Ratchasima and
Buriram in the region known today as northeast Thailand.[4]
But alas,
the intricate tapestry bequeathed by these states has indeed been rendered
tenuous with time. One fact, however, is known for sure. Around the second
half of the 13th century, Sinhalese Buddhism entered the Central Plains and
the Southern Peninsula region of early Thailand and steadily displaced all
other religious traditions.
* * *
To return
once again to our major leitmotif, we reiterate the fact that all of the
traditions schools and theories alluded to throughout the course this
broader study are, culturally speaking, fundamentally Hindu. They are, in
other words, a product of the Greater Indian cultural milieu. Naturally
those elements that arrived to Thailand, did so only by the process of
filtration, through the various regional cultural screens, and by the
gradual processes of accretion, adaptation and evolution. Thus, certain
features of Vajrayāna Buddhism came to Thailand directly from Nalanda in
Northeast India while other slightly altered forms came from Java. Khmer
Vajrayāna was introduced in the 12th century and established itself in two
different regions. One infusion came overland through the Central Plains and
Northeast regions while another arrived by sea to the southeast coastal
kingdom of Nakhon Śri Thammarat.
* * *
At the end
of the day, one can only concur with the youthful sentiment of French
archaeologist George Cœdès that, indeed, it is the tremendous variety of
civilizations that existed simultaneously or successively in "Siam" that
makes it such an absorbing field of study.[5]
T. D. Harris,
last revised
16 Nov 2008.
_______________
Notes
[1]
Michael Vickerey,
"Cambodia and Its Neighbors in the 15th Century," ARI Working Paper,
#27, June 2004,
www.ari.nus.edu.sg/pub/wps.htm: 14.
[2]
My understanding owes
much to resources offered by Thai historian Kamala Tiyavanich, private
correspondence, fall, 1998.
[3]
Kamala Tiyavanich,
Forest Recollections: Wandering Ascetics in 20th Century Thailand,
Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1997: 303-4, n. 22.
[4]
Pattaratorn
Chirapravati, Votive Tablets in Thailand (Origins, Styles & Uses),
Oxford University Press, 1998. Chirapravati is an art historian who
studied the iconography and stylistic development of votive tablets and stupas discovered in Thailand by archaeologists. In her academic work,
she excerpts a broad range of religious traditions that flourished
between the 6th and 13th centuries around the Isthmus of Kra and the
northern portion of the (Malayan) Peninsula, i.e., the region that makes
up present day southern Thailand. The votive tablets are small icons,
usually made of baked or unbaked clay using a press-mold technique. They
apparently originated from an Indian custom (term unknown) and were
called "tsa-tsa" in Tibet, but in Thailand they were known as phra
phi tham or "tablets made by spirits/angels." According to her
thesis, every tablet contains an idea of the particular sect it
represents.
[5]
George Cœdès, "Recent
Archaeological Progress in Siam," in Indian Arts and Letters, New
Series, I, 1, 1927: 57-58.
Menu
Home
|